9/27/2023 0 Comments Dupeguru me![]() ![]() Lr might be an obvious choice for this, and it has a duplicate finder plugin, The process of organization itself will turn up some, but since you're having to look at so many might as well do it once and do it right. Having been through this with some other largish collections of digital images, I'd say that you should also look at some software and workflows to achieve your final organization, and only turn to removing duplicates once that's in place. If Google Photos or something else has stripped the metadata, it's not only going to be harder to find duplicates but harder to organize that shoebox of photos going forward. ![]() Might as well clear out some junk while you're at it, because it's difficult to let some algorithm make the choices for you. It was photo specific, so you could adjust parameters for finding duplicates, group images that were possible brackets (not the same image, but duplicates for our purposes usually), and in general do a lot of culling more easily. I think I used DupeGuru quite a while ago, and it was OK.īut more recently I've used PhotoSweeper, but I think it's macOS only. Is there a tool better than DupeGuru that will allow me to say that even though the date/time matches, I want the largest file and the most metadata? I kept sidecar files that contain metadata, such as json and txt files, just in the event I might want the extra image metadata they contain ini files - how does this stuff get in there over 25 years? Has had all the crud taken out - MS Word files, PDF's, spreadsheets. Consolidated in one folder, with countless sub folders I keep as they sometimes provide good context about the photos they contain But, I then learned by checking, that some of the files I was choosing didn't have the best "Date" metadata, or any at all. ![]() I found that DupeGuru can list file matches on EXIF data, and in the results, I can choose the largest file in each bunch, in hopes of keeping the photos with the most image data. In a previous attempt to de-dupe, I used DupeGuru to de-dupe and what I found is that what constitutes a "match" may not take everything I need into consideration. I have a 100k photo library collected from different cameras and downloaded from Google Photos. This is a slightly deeper question than simply finding dupes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |